DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 552 billion parameters, just 8 billion awake to read your prompt
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is the open multimodal language model from Chinese lab DeepSeek, the first built on a new architecture with native image understanding and a one-million-token context window. Released on September 10, 2026 under an MIT license, its weights download freely from Hugging Face. On the API, off-peak input runs $0.15 per million tokens, with cached input dropping to $0.003. Coding agents, terminal work and long-document analysis are its home turf.
- One-million-token context window
- MIT-licensed open weights, commercial use permitted
- Native image input, trained in from day one
- Cached-input rate among the lowest on the market
- Fast output, around 214 tokens per second
- Raw reasoning trails Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
- Self-hosting calls for hundreds of GB of GPU memory
- Fairly verbose when reasoning effort is dialed up
Causal encoder-decoder, the asymmetric design under the hood
The Causal Encoder-Decoder architecture debuting here activates 8 billion parameters to read your prompt and 16 billion to write the answer, out of 552 billion total arranged as a mixture of experts. Reading is cheaper than generating, a deliberate choice for agents that swallow huge contexts.
The other lever is the KV cache, squeezed down to 890 bytes per token, roughly a quarter of the previous Flash generation. Agents that reread the same repository or system instructions all day pay far less (that cache line is where most of an agent bill quietly hides).
- 1,048,576-token context, up to 384,000 completion tokens
- Reasoning effort dial adjustable from 1 to 100
- Trained from scratch on 45 trillion multimodal tokens
- Native vision, images and text learned together from pre-training
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash against Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
On the launch benchmarks, V4.1-Flash beats its own bigger sibling V4-Pro across most coding and agent tests, which is why DeepSeek made it the default model of its API. Against the American heavyweights, the picture is more mixed.
It snatches first place on DeepSWE and Automation-Bench, then gives ground as soon as tool-free reasoning is involved. To place those scores in the current pecking order, a regularly updated ranking of language models keeps things in perspective.
| Benchmark | V4.1-Flash | Claude Opus 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 74.2 | 74.0 | 73.0 |
| Automation-Bench | 54.8 | 50.3 | 45.8 |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 30.0 | 43.3 | 34.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.8 | 56.3 | 44.5 |
What DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs, peak versus off-peak
The API charges $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens off-peak, with peak hours doubling both figures. A cached input token falls to $0.003 per million, a floor rarely seen anywhere.
Peak windows run 01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC on weekdays, everything else is off-peak. Schedule your heavy agent jobs for the weekend and the bill shrinks by half. The model name to set is deepseek-flash, and third-party hosts serve it too, OpenRouter first among them. DeepSeek adjusts its rate card often, so treat the official pricing page as the only source that counts.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash free?
The weights are free to download on Hugging Face under an MIT license, commercial use included. The official API bills per token, with off-peak rates at half price. In between, third-party hosts such as OpenRouter serve it pay-as-you-go, with no subscription required.
Can you run DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash locally?
Yes, with serious hardware. At 552 billion parameters, plan on roughly 300 GB of GPU memory in 4-bit quantization, so a multi-GPU server rather than a laptop. Below very high volumes, the API or a third-party host works out far cheaper than self-hosting.
What happens to DeepSeek-V4-Pro?
DeepSeek first announced that V4-Pro requests would route to V4.1-Flash from September 14, 2026, then reversed course. The lab now keeps the V4-Pro API running with unchanged billing until a future V4.1-Pro arrives as the next flagship.
Does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash match Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6?
On agent and coding tasks it plays in the same league at a fraction of the price. On tool-free reasoning it sits behind, scoring 40 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index against 53 for GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 at maximum reasoning effort.
Verdict: An agent rereading the same repository all day costs a fortune elsewhere and next to nothing here. Teams running high-volume coding or automation agents get one of the best intelligence-per-dollar ratios available, keeping a heavyweight reasoning model on standby for the thorniest problems.
